1 March 2026
The IP Landscape for Tech Companies in the EU
For technology companies operating in or expanding into the European Union, intellectual property protection is not merely a legal formality — it is a core business requirement. Whether the asset in question is a software platform, a patented algorithm, a brand name, a database, or a trade secret, the failure to secure appropriate legal protection can have consequences ranging from lost competitive advantage to catastrophic litigation.
The European Union offers a sophisticated and multi-layered intellectual property framework administered through a combination of EU-wide registration systems and national rights. Understanding which system is appropriate for which type of IP — and which combination of rights provides the most comprehensive protection — requires both legal expertise and a strategic understanding of the company's commercial objectives.
Germany occupies a central position in the European IP landscape. It is home to one of the world's most active IP litigation jurisdictions, particularly for patent disputes, and the German Federal Patent Court (Bundespatentgericht) in Munich handles some of the most significant patent cases in Europe. For technology companies with IP that matters in the German market — which, as the EU's largest economy, most do — proactive protection and enforcement strategy is essential.
"Intellectual property is often the most valuable asset a technology company holds. In Europe, the question is not whether you need to protect it — the question is whether you are protecting it correctly, comprehensively, and in all the jurisdictions where it matters." — Benjamin Koch, Partner, LexBerg Law Firm
EU Trademark Protection: The EUIPO and National Rights
The most widely used EU-wide IP registration mechanism for technology companies is the European Union Trade Mark (EUTM), administered by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in Alicante, Spain. A single EUTM application — currently costing €850 for a single class — provides trademark protection across all 27 EU member states simultaneously. This makes it significantly more cost-effective than maintaining separate national registrations in each member state.
However, EUTM registration is subject to the principle of unitary character — a successful challenge to the mark in any one member state can result in invalidation across the entire EU. For this reason, many brand owners complement their EUTM with national registrations in key markets — including Germany — as a defensive measure. German national trademark registrations before the DPMA (Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt) are also faster to obtain and can provide earlier priority dates in contested situations.
Trademark clearance searches prior to filing are essential and frequently underutilised by early-stage technology companies. Filing a mark without searching for conflicting earlier rights — particularly in the EU's complex multi-lingual environment where phonetically or visually similar marks in different languages may conflict — can result in opposition proceedings, costly litigation, and ultimately the loss of the chosen brand.
Software and Algorithm Protection: Patents vs. Copyright
One of the most frequent questions we receive from technology clients is whether their software or algorithm can be patented in Europe. The European Patent Convention (EPC) Article 52 excludes programs for computers as such from patentability — but the word 'as such' has been the subject of extensive case law before the European Patent Office (EPO) and national courts, and the practical outcome is more nuanced than the statutory exclusion suggests.
Software that produces a 'technical effect' going beyond the normal physical interactions between the program and the computer on which it runs can be patentable in Europe. Computer-implemented inventions — software that controls industrial processes, improves data processing efficiency in a technically demonstrable way, or drives hardware in novel ways — are regularly granted patent protection at the EPO. The key is characterising the invention in terms of its technical contribution.
Copyright protection, by contrast, arises automatically in most EU member states upon creation of an original work and does not require registration. In Germany, software copyright is protected under the Urheberrechtsgesetz (UrhG). Copyright protects the specific expression of the code — not the underlying ideas, methods, or algorithms. For technology companies, copyright is a necessary but insufficient form of protection: it prevents literal copying of code but does not prevent a competitor from independently developing functionally identical software using a different codebase.
Trade secrets — protecting confidential know-how, proprietary processes, and unregistered information — have become an increasingly important IP tool following the implementation of the EU Trade Secrets Directive (2016/943) across member states. Germany implemented the directive through the Geschäftsgeheimnisgesetz (GeschGehG) in 2019, significantly strengthening the legal framework for trade secret protection and enforcement in Germany.
IP Enforcement: Protecting Your Rights in Europe
Having registered rights is only half the battle. Active monitoring and enforcement of IP rights is essential, particularly in fast-moving technology markets where infringement can cause rapid commercial damage before it is identified and addressed.
In Germany, IP enforcement options include interim injunctions (einstweilige Verfügungen) — which are available on an ex parte basis in urgent cases from specialist IP courts including the Regional Courts of Düsseldorf, Hamburg, Frankfurt, and Munich — as well as full infringement proceedings, customs seizure actions, and criminal complaints in cases of wilful infringement. Germany's specialised IP courts have a justified international reputation for speed, sophistication, and rigour in IP disputes.
LexBerg's intellectual property team, working with our network of specialist IP litigation partners, advises technology companies on portfolio management, freedom-to-operate analyses, infringement monitoring, and enforcement strategy across Germany and the wider EU. We also advise on IP assignments, licensing agreements, and the IP structuring of joint ventures and M&A transactions where IP assets are material to the deal value.